THE LAST HAVEN STANDING
by Peter Schiff
The markets are going through another sell-off phase, yet the traditional notions of a ‘safe haven’ are changing. No longer is the US dollar the default shelter; instead, gold, the Swiss franc, and the Japanese yen are the preferred assets.
All three of these havens – gold, francs, and yen – have been surging upward this month. Two of them, however, are being actively devalued by central banks desperately (and foolishly) trying to curtail appreciation. The Swiss and Japanese are enlisting both policy measures and all the banker-speak they can muster to stem the tide of investment flows into their currencies.
The game is Last Haven Standing, and Spielberg has already acquired the movie rights.
SWITZERLAND: FROM NEUTRALITY TO INTERVENTION
Looking to Europe, the Financial Times now has the awkward task of reporting that mighty European Union’s currency is coming apart at the seams, while neighboring Switzerland has barely enough hotels to house the world’s waterlogged financial refugees. The franc is up 5.41% against the euro this year and almost 14% against the dollar. One wonders if the only way to prevent a collapse of the these major debtor currencies is to back them with Swiss-made wristwatches. At least then they’d have a partial gold standard and there’d be no excuse to be late for an austerity protest!
Unfortunately, the Swiss National Bank is so afraid of the franc’s rise that it has flooded the market with liquidity and cut interest rates to zero. The SNB even recently threatened to peg the franc to the euro. It’s as if survivors on one of the Titanic’s lifeboats were so confused and bewildered that they began tying their boat to the sinking behemoth out of a desire for a ‘stable relationship.’
NOTE TO JAPAN: IT’S NOT THE SPECULATORS
Japan, ironically, has been blessed that while its debt problems are severe, they’ve been severe for so long that markets are willing to take that as a sign of stability. And, aside from the public debt problem, Japan does have fairly impressive fundamentals. They are still a productive economy with high personal savings and exposure to booming China. So, it’s no wonder the Yen has risen 6.63% against the dollar so far this year.
Former Finance Minister, and now Prime Minister, Yoshihiko Noda stated recently that he would “take bold actions if necessary and won’t rule out any possible options” to restrain the yen’s appreciation. Yet, while Noda has said the ministry will study whether “speculation” is behind the yen’s rise, he doesn’t seem to understand that this is a permanent move away from dollars and euros and into anything which might be a better alternative. This is not driven by Wall Street gamblers, but rather by everyday investors seeking shelter.
CLEARLY SHIFTING SENTIMENTS
My readers know that I see these past years in the US markets as one ongoing crisis. We’re not “facing a double-dip recession” as the media suggests; instead, we’re really in the midst of a prolonged economic depression. The periodic market panics since 2007, both in the US and Europe, all stem from the same disease and, as such, ought to be properly understood as related symptoms, not as separate events.
And as one long, ugly narrative, these subsequent panics resemble a series of steps; sharp drops leading down either to a dismal “new normal” or – more likely – a collapse in both the fiat dollar and euro currencies and a widespread return to gold as money.
My brother, Andrew Schiff, wrote an article for my brokerage firm this month reviewing the market turmoil and how it compares to previous crises since ’07. He found a steady shift in what investors perceive as a safe haven.
During the depths of the credit crunch, from October 2008 to March 2009, the S&P lost over a quarter of its value, as investors flocked to the US dollar, driving it up 8%. Foreign stock markets sold off and most foreign currencies fell substantially. The Swiss franc fell over 3%. Gold rose some 6.5% and the yen rose 5.75%, but neither kept pace with the US dollar, which rose 13.5%.
Then, during the dip between April 23, 2010 and July 2, 2010, the S&P dropped again by almost 15%. The dollar rallied barely more than 3%. The Swiss franc gained slightly instead of falling. And this time, both the yen and gold beat the dollar, gaining 4% and 5.5% respectively.
Now here we are in August, and what’s happening?
In extreme volatility, the S&P fell over 13% before rebounding to its starting place. The dollar has remained essentially flat even with intensified fears in the euro zone. The yen is also flat, despite heavy intervention to push it down. The Swiss franc rose 8% before Switzerland’s central bank threatened to peg the currency to the euro, and gold has surged almost 12%!
See the pattern? On each step of this multi-year downward spiral, global investors are slowly but coherently altering their preferred safe haven. Alternatives are being desperately sought, though actions first by the Japanese central bank and more recently by the Swiss have prevented their currencies from fully realizing potential gains as dollar-alternatives.
Fortunately, gold doesn’t have a central bank, so it can rise as fast as the dollar falls.
THE FIAT DOWNGRADE
Whether it is in their interests or not – and I argue it is not – central bankers look set on continued competitive devaluation of their currencies so that their economies don’t have to do the hard work of retooling for the new reality.
That is why gold is doing so phenomenally well, and why it should continue to do so. New gold comes into the market at a rate of about 2% per year. This number has been fairly steady over time, and reflects the ability of mining companies to locate, finance, purchase, and develop new gold mines. I invest in these companies, and trust me, it’s not an easy job.
Contrast this with a paper currency – more dollars can be created by Bernanke simply printing extra zeros on his banknotes. See that $10 bill? Shazam, it’s a $100!
The reason currencies like the yen and Swiss franc are considered safe is simply a longstanding habit of their central banks not to print too much. But a habit is much less reliable than a physical constraint.
Think of a dog that has been trained not to eat steak. If you put it in a room with a juicy ribeye, would you be more confident the steak would be there when you came back if the dog was in a kennel or just sitting there? Just like a dog always craves steak, and will grab a bite when no one’s looking, central bankers always crave the printing press.
That’s why we need to hold an asset for which scarcity is dictated by nature itself – gold.
As this realization becomes more commonplace, and as this depression accelerates, I expect gold to be the Last Haven Standing. This will not be a “new normal,” but rather a return to thousands of years of economic tradition.
A NOTE ABOUT THE FUNDAMENTALS
Those who do not really understand the fundamentals, such as commodity trader Dennis Gartman, continue to look at gold’s rise as a bubble. In fact, Gartman just called the top in gold, again, claiming that one of the “great bubbles of our time” had finally popped.
He cites as evidence the quick 200-point rise to over $1900/oz, which Gartman sees as a speculative blow-off top. He also cites the meaningless fact that one Gold ETF, GLD, has a larger market cap than one S&P 500 ETF. He absurdly compares this situation to the Japanese Emperor’s palace eclipsing the value of the entire state of California at the top of Japan’s real estate bubble. Those ETFs simply represent one way of owning assets, and do not, as Gartman contends, indicate that investors value gold higher than the entire US stock market. In fact, a true comparison of the two asset classes reveals gold’s value is historically low relative to the value of US stocks.
Rather than the bursting of a bubble, the recent technical action in gold is more indicative of a break-out. In fact, the positive divergence of gold stock from bullion in this recent correction is evidence that a more powerful leg in this bull market is about to begin. Up until now, the market for gold stocks has been characterized by fear. However, it now appears to me that gold stocks will make a new high before the metal itself. If the stocks finally begin to lead the metal, it means traders are finally starting to believe in this rally. Rather than evidencing the end of the trend, such a shift in sentiment likely indicates an acceleration in that trend. Maybe when the last skeptic finally throws in the towel, we may finally get the blow-off top Gartman thinks already occurred – but that day is likely many years into the future.
In fact, all the talk about a gold bubble seems to be based on the fact that so many investors are now talking about gold. However, the problem with this argument is that despite all the talking, very few investors are actually buying. Bubbles are not formed by talk, but by action. Before we get a gold bubble, all those investors talking about gold actually have to buy an ounce. In fact, before a bubble pops, its not just investors, but the average man in the street who will have to be buying. Thus far, he has not even joined the conversation.
Peter Schiff is CEO and Chief Global Strategist of Euro Pacific Precious Metals, a gold and silver coin and bullion dealer offering no-nonsense products at competitive prices.
If you would like more information about Euro Pacific Precious Metals,
click here or go to our website, www.europacmetals.com. For the fastest service, call 1-888-GOLD-160.,
A TALE OF TWO TAKE-DOWNS
by Jeff Nielson of Bullion Bulls Canada
There’s something fishy going on in the metals market. I’m not going to call it a conspiracy, but let’s take a look at some recent events with an open mind and see where the evidence leads us.
There have been two recent “take-downs” in the precious metals sector that have caught the eye of commentators. First, a plunge in the silver market at the end of April. Second, the recent mini-correction in the gold market. Both of these events were not borne of natural, profit-taking behavior, but rather changing margin requirements at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), where huge quantities of the precious metals are bought and sold on margin every day. As such, it requires delving into the inner working of that market to understand just what’s happening to our bullion investments.
A PERFECT CRIME
Let me approach the brief-but-sickening collapse in the silver market at the end of April from a somewhat unusual perspective. I’ll offer what I would submit to readers is the “perfect (hypothetical) crime” – and then compare that to actual events. Let the perpetrator of this perfect crime be a Financial Oligarch with tremendous “market power.” Specifically, the Financial Oligarch is sitting on a gigantic “short” position in the silver market (roughly twice the size of the legendary “long” position of the Hunt Brothers back in 1980), and has access to infinite amounts of 0% financing (i.e. “money to burn”).
If I were to assume the place of said Oligarch, here is how I would execute my strategy:
First of all, I would engage in significant short-covering while the price of silver was rising. This would accomplish two aspects of my plan. One, it would cause the price to explode upward vertically. Two, it would significantly reduce my overall exposure, thus also reducing the effective amount of leverage in my short position.
However, I am also aware that trading in the silver market is watched (and analyzed) by a number of astute commentators who recognize short-covering when they see it. So, to disguise my strategy, I’d do something which no analyst would expect from a massive “short” (while prices are rising): I would also open some long positions.
Why would no one ever expect such a tactic? Because to do so while prices are rising and I’m also engaging in short-covering would cause the upward “spike” to be even more extreme, and thus the losses on my massive short position would be astronomical – more than canceling-out any possible profits from my long position. It would, however, effectively “muddy the waters” in silver trading, so that my short-covering was no longer obvious.
At this point, I’d go running to the regulator/administrator of this market. Being a dominant Financial Oligarch, this administrator is a close, personal friend.
I implore him to “do something” about this radical, vertical move in the price of silver. “The speculators are out of control,” I plead. Being a “too big to fail” Financial Oligarch, I hint that if the price of silver should continue spiraling higher that I could be wiped-out by the losses on my short position. I point out that this would be extremely “disruptive” not only for the silver market, but for global financial markets in general.
The administrator does “do something,” jacking-up margin requirements on silver contracts significantly. The price of silver immediately begins to plummet. Not only is the margin increase impacting other players in the market, but I do a couple of things myself to “help” this downward momentum: I begin adding to my short positions and liquidating my long positions. I don’t care about my paper-losses on those long contracts, as I can get all the “free money” I need from my other “friend” (with the printing press).
However, I’m still not satisfied. I return to my friend the administrator. I whisper into his ear that with such incredibly bullish economic fundamentals in this market that if the administrator were to “let up” on the downward pressure that the price of silver would immediately boomerang higher – and be more “bullish” (from a technical analysis standpoint) than if the administrator had done nothing at all!
The administrator accedes to my reasoning/pressure. Four more margin-hikes follow, in rapid-fire succession. The price of silver is reduced by one-third. All bullish sentiment has (temporarily) been bludgeoned out of this market. My “perfect crime” is a success.
SILVER MARKET REALITIES
What did actually happen in the silver market at the end of April?
For my money, there is no commentator whose analysis of the silver (or gold) derivatives market is on par with veteran metals-trader Dan Norcini. Here is Norcini’s analysis from April 21st (note that this was written before the CME Group raised margin requirements five times in the silver market over just a few weeks, and so there can be no claims of “revisionism” in his analysis):
“…This has been a strange market to read with what I consider to be confusing CFTC COT reports and various changes in the daily open interest as well as all manner of rumors surrounding the delivery process. If I had nothing to go on but price action, I would say that a large short or shorts are in serious trouble and are attempting to get out [i.e. being forced to "cover" their positions] but are not being allowed to by some very big and committed buyers
Even Norcini doesn’t suspect that this “committed buyer” might actually be the biggest short, itself.
Looking at the silver chart (below) in the critical days just prior to the five margin hikes by the CME, we see no alarming spike in “open interest,” which is what we would certainly expect to see in any manic buying by speculators. Open interest did not even approach a 12-month high, let alone go near “all-time” levels. There is simply no evidence that out-of-control “speculative buying” was taking place in the silver market at this time.
Click image to enlarge
Source: Dan Norcini, used with permission
The timing of the hike is also suspicious. The end of April marks the end of the bullish season for precious metals and the normal onset of fresh ambushes by the shorts. Suggesting that speculators were “rushing into the silver market” at the end of April makes about as much sense as someone sticking their neck under a guillotine as the blade has just begun to fall.
With no reason for speculators to enter this market at that time, and no evidence that they had done so, we are left with one very disturbing (and unanswered) question for the CME Group: how could it possibly the justify the last four margin-increases, given that the price of silver never approached its recent high, but rather was in a falling trend as each new margin increase was announced?
Readers must understand that any/all pretenses by the mainstream media that the silver market had hit any sort of “top” are utterly absurd. Commodity markets universally exhibit one distinct feature: any/all “tops” in a bull market are always accompanied by significant build-ups of inventory. In the silver market, our record-low inventories continue to dwindle. This is conclusive evidence that silver remains under-priced.
WHAT ABOUT THE DIPS IN GOLD?
With this extremely suspicious event in the silver market now behind us, it’s time to look at a price-spike in the market of the other precious metal (no offense to fellow “gold bugs” intended). At this point, all evidence is that we are witnessing a radically different event.
Rather than being at the end of the bullish season (as we were with silver in April), we are now just entering the bullish season. Not only is the surge in the price of gold expected (if somewhat earlier than in recent years), but it is supported by enormously gold-bullish events in global financial markets and many of the world’s largest economies.
This places the two margin increases just put through in the gold market in a totally different context. Here are some further remarks from Dan Norcini from August 11th:
“…We did see some questionable margin hikes when silver was declining from the $50 area, margin hikes that were very suspicious, but that is not the case right here in gold. In fact, I am surprised the margins were not raised sooner and again I see nothing sinister here…”
Note that, unlike what happened in the silver market, when the recent, second increase in margin requirements for gold contracts was announced by the CME Group, the price of gold was above the level when the first margin-increase was announced. This reinforces Norcini’s prior conclusion, as it suggests that (unlike silver in May) bullish sentiment is continuing to increase, and thus this form of “braking action” in the gold market appears completely benign from the standpoint of motivation.
Looking at the two “take-downs” in precious metals (silver in May, and the $200/oz, 3-day plunge in the gold market last week), we see that any proper analysis of such events requires looking at much more than merely price-action in these markets. It also requires closely examining changes in open interest and inventory levels.
The failure of the CME Group to do this in May leaves it open to at least criticism – if not a formal investigation of its conduct. This is especially true given the testimony a year earlier from whistleblower and veteran metals-trader Andrew Maguire.
At this point, we have no indication of a repeat-event in the gold market. However, the need for all participants in these markets to remain vigilant is more obvious than ever.
Jeff Nielson studied economics and law at the University of British Columbia, obtaining his degree in 1989. He came to the precious metals sector in the mid-’00s as an investor and quickly decided he wanted to make it the focus of his career. He is the co-founder of Bullion Bulls Canada, a precious metals website with a global audience which provides economic analysis, commentary on precious metals, and detailed information on more than 100 North American listed mining companies.
Since starting Bullion Bulls Canada, Mr. Nielson’s work has been widely published on sites such as Seeking Alpha and TheStreet, along with dozens of precious metals websites.
For more of Jeff’s insights and analysis, visit www.bullionbullscanada.com.
THIS MONTH IN GOLD
JPM Eyes Gold at $2,500 by December
Financial Post – Prior to Standard & Poor’s downgrade of US sovereign debt, JP Morgan analysts expected gold to stay at or below the $1,800 an ounce level in 2011. Post-bombshell, however, that projection has been revised upward to $2,500. Analysts Colin Fenton and Jonah Waxman are encouraging their clients to buy commodities with an Asia, production, and inflation bias, and are counseling them to eschew those with a strong US or consumption link. Despite near-term headwinds for commodities as a consequence of global growth scares, the analysts foresee emerging market demand coming out of the dip with noticeably greater vigor. Read full article >>
Margin Hikes Hit Gold; Gold Hits Back
CNBC (Reuters) – Gold experienced volatility this past month, plunging almost $200 in late August. But you just can’t keep a good thing down. The correction – one welcomed and expected by buy-and-hold precious metals investors – quickly found support around $1750. Then, as if on cue, specie resumed its relentless uphill climb. The cause of the correction? Just as with silver in the spring, the cause was double-digit, back-to-back margin hikes by the CME Group, the world’s largest commodities exchange, which hit leveraged momentum traders the hardest. Secular investors were presented with a unique buy-in opportunity. Read full article >>
Central Banks Polish Gold’s Shine
Financial Times – In a Commodities Note, FT reporter Jack Farchy argues today’s 40-year-old fiat money system is “looking its age.” Following a generation on sabbatical, gold is once again recapturing its role as a cornerstone of the international financial system. The most striking proof lies in copious central bank buying as of late, a dynamic that is likely to undergird the market for years to come. The official sector bought an astonishing 208 tons of the yellow metal in the first half of 2011; the record since 1971 is 276 tons for all of 1981. The sea change puts paid to the pronouncements of commentators characterizing the gold market as a bubble, Farchy says. Read full article >>
Chavez Recalls Venezuela’s Gold
Bloomberg – Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, ever the contrarian, is moving sooner rather than later. Predicting (and surely hoping to expedite) the demise of the US dollar system, President Chavez this month issued orders to his government to repatriate the country’s $11 billion in gold reserves sitting abroad. He also said he will nationalize the country’s gold industry to “halt illegal mining and bolster reserves.” What to do with the bullion once it’s back home? Why, invest in emerging markets, of course. President Chavez is urging the Venezuelan central bank to diversify its international reserves – of which gold comprises approximately 60 percent – away from US institutions. Read full article >>
The Nixon Shock
Bloomberg Businessweek – The year is 1971, and rather than disappoint the electorate with a recession and risk losing re-election, President Richard Nixon delinks the US dollar from gold, encourages money printing to paper over his problems, and thereby introduces the complex, volatile financial era of the present. In an informative, five-page investigative piece, Roger Lowenstein chronicles the issues and personalities surrounding the closing of the Federal Reserve’s gold window. “[Bankers] have become ever more apt to please politicians, deferring recessions at the risk of inflating asset bubbles… We see it now in the troubles of nations from Greece to Ireland to the U.S…This is Ben Bernanke’s unfortunate inheritance.” Read full article >>